Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1418

reference
695-tree-1
name
1418
tree-preservation-order

undefined

695-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.011912 50.881452)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.011883 50.881449,-1.011889 50.881459,-1.011895 50.881463,-1.011911 50.881467,-1.011928 50.881464,-1.011935 50.881460,-1.011939 50.881455,-1.011940 50.881449,-1.011939 50.881444,-1.011935 50.881439,-1.011929 50.881435,-1.011921 50.881432,-1.011912 50.881431,-1.011895 50.881434,-1.011889 50.881438,-1.011885 50.881443,-1.011883 50.881449)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL